The Rev Counter - The Motorbike Community Click to see demographic‘s profileClick to see Ernie Cooley‘s profileClick to visit this Sponsor

These advertisements are removed when you register and become a TRC Supporter / Sponsor member.

"Bits of modern motorbikes that are antiquated" thread in "Motorbike Chat"
only ridden a couple of shaft driven bikes, and they were so well behaved you would hardly know [a K100 beemer and a couple of ...


Thread Tags: deauville


Go Back   Homepage > Community @ The Rev Counter > The Rev Counter > Motorbike Chat
Register Blogs Forums TRC Trader Reviews Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28-01-08, 11:40   #16 (permalink)
Deleted On Request
Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Casino cash: £
Default

only ridden a couple of shaft driven bikes, and they were so well behaved you would hardly know [a K100 beemer and a couple of CX500s]. how a lightweight sports type bike would feel, i really don't know.
  Reply With Quote
These advertisements are reduced in size when you become a registered member and removed when you become a TRC Supporter / Sponsor member.

Old 28-01-08, 11:43   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
bullitt's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 212
Casino cash: £177901
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0/0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnAliRse View Post
The prime example being the drive chain.

Modern bikes have enormously impressive power figures, after years of intense development; we have innovations like slipper clutches and fly-by-wire throttles; whilst allowing all the power to be delivered to the rear wheel by an invention that is a couple of hundred years old, i.e. the chain!!!!

It goes rusty, needs adjusting & lubing etc - all archaic practices when taken in context with other bike developments.

Yes there's shaft drive - OK, it weighs more, loses a bit of power and doesn't wheelie (!), but surely with modern materials like titanium etc. these issues can be overcome?

Or there's the Buell / Harley idea of kevlar belt drive - doesn't rust, needs minimal maintenance etc.

Perhaps it's time the manufacturers turned their attention to these practical issues rather than the relentless pursuit of more power.....


When Harley changed from a chain to a belt drive, at first it was not well received. Manufactures consider how well changes in their product may be received.

Totally Dagenham...two stops beyond Barking!
bullitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 11:48   #18 (permalink)
Fuck this, lets ride
 
TooFamousRob's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,044
Casino cash: £467900
Thanks: 5
Thanked: 9/8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Voyager View Post
I think the most modern bike sold with a chain case was the TR1. Can anyone think of one that post dates that early eighties marketing failure?

The late eighties/early nineties Norton Classic and Commander did too.



No more successful than the TR1, though.

In the Bible, God made it rain for 40 days and 40 nights. That's a pretty good summer for us in Wales. That's a hosepipe ban waiting to happen. I was eight before I realised you could take a kagoule off.(Rhod Gilbert)
TooFamousRob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 11:49   #19 (permalink)
Banned

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,827
Casino cash: £232800
Thanks: 46
Thanked: 125/109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveMac View Post
Shaft Jacking ? sorry, don't know the term, do you mean the Torque action of the shaft?
'Shaft jacking' is a pretty common description for the effect on a motorcycle. Google it.

Rotation will cause vertical movement. Since the pinion cannot climb the crown wheel and the swingarm and rear drive are hinged at one end the torque of the wheel and drive will tend to move the suspension vertically under acceleration.
Voyager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 11:50   #20 (permalink)
Banned

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,827
Casino cash: £232800
Thanks: 46
Thanked: 125/109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TooFamousRob View Post
The late eighties/early nineties Norton Classic and Commander did too.
You're quite right. Well done.
Voyager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 11:51   #21 (permalink)
Banned

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,827
Casino cash: £232800
Thanks: 46
Thanked: 125/109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bullitt View Post
Manufactures consider how well changes in their product may be received.
You are also quite right.

It isn't that modern motorcycles are antiquated - it is that the buyers are.
Voyager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 11:52   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: the roulette table
Posts: 521
Casino cash: £149350
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 6
Thanked: 2/2
Angry

"Diluting a good thread with white noise" negative point.

WTF! One great addtion and some light humour, miserable bastard!

FUCK OFF who ever added that!
Olivier Spanners is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 11:55   #23 (permalink)
Enormous Member
 
GiantPygmy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Up the junction
Posts: 1,513
Casino cash: £496700
Thanks: 11
Thanked: 8/8
Default

As Voyager quite rightly states, the basic design is as antiquated as the invention of the pedal bicycle, but its called a motorcycle so thats alright with me.

I agree that just becuase the original design of something is antique, doesn't mean it needs replacing. However, although modern chains get far higher mileages than in years gone by, they are still a pain in the arse.

I rode an F800 BMW recently which had belt drive. Why is belt drive not is wider use?
GiantPygmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 11:56   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Spider101's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Fens
Posts: 182
Casino cash: £152754
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 1/1
Default

I have a '98 CG125 that has an enclosed chain. I think the demise of the chaincase is entirely down to the whims of fashion more than anything else.
Spider101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 11:58   #25 (permalink)
Banned

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,827
Casino cash: £232800
Thanks: 46
Thanked: 125/109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spider101 View Post
I have a '98 CG125 that has an enclosed chain. I think the demise of the chaincase is entirely down to the whims of fashion than anything else.
I was discounting things that had survived simply through dint of long production runs. The CG was designed in the late 60's as a utilitarian bike - a position in which it succeeds in very well.
Voyager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 12:03   #26 (permalink)
One foot in the rave
 
Kebab The Cat's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Live in Leamington, work in Brum
Posts: 1,121
Casino cash: £183749
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 58
Thanked: 21/21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spider101 View Post
I have a '98 CG125 that has an enclosed chain. I think the demise of the chaincase is entirely down to the whims of fashion more than anything else.
Not sure about that. I quite like being able to see my chain, so I can decide if it needs a bit of a tighten or a bit of lube.

Honest question - I've never seen a chaincase bike - but how much visual inspection can you do if you've got one?

KtC
Kebab The Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 12:07   #27 (permalink)
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 122
Casino cash: £201450
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 1/1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TooFamousRob View Post
The late eighties/early nineties Norton Classic and Commander did too.



No more successful than the TR1, though.
Oh dear...that Norton was a bit fugly wasn't it?
AnnAliRse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 12:07   #28 (permalink)
Straight line hero
 
AbjectBlitz's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 739
Casino cash: £198100
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 1/1
Send a message via MSN to AbjectBlitz
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kebab The Cat View Post
Not sure about that. I quite like being able to see my chain, so I can decide if it needs a bit of a tighten or a bit of lube.

Honest question - I've never seen a chaincase bike - but how much visual inspection can you do if you've got one?

KtC
On my MZ it was a piece of piss to just slide the bottom rubber closure off to inspect and just slide it back on. And with some heavy black grease it NEVER needed lubing again. Just tighten.

Blitz0r'd ZZR1200 Heavyweight Power



HM Government Approved Road Pirate
AbjectBlitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 12:07   #29 (permalink)
Banned

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,827
Casino cash: £232800
Thanks: 46
Thanked: 125/109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kebab The Cat View Post
Not sure about that. I quite like being able to see my chain, so I can decide if it needs a bit of a tighten or a bit of lube.

Honest question - I've never seen a chaincase bike - but how much visual inspection can you do if you've got one?
Inspection hole.

Clever, these Edwardians.
Voyager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-08, 12:08   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Hunter's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,965
Casino cash: £165900
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 3
Thanked: 28/27
Default

thatd be every single internal combustion engine in use currently...

you'd think with the pace of development the ICE would be obsolte by now

KARMA... THE GREAT LEVELLER...
Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
deauville

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:47.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Term, Conditions & Privacy · Unless member submitted, the contents of this webpage are copyright © Dragon Tree. All Rights Reserved · Advertise with TRC